Login   /   Register
Butt, Akhtar, Mehmood, Imran, Rukh, Kayani, Siddique, Abbasi, Qayyum, and Ahmad: Relationship of Soil Potassium Forms with Maize Potassium Contents in Soils Derived from Different Parent Materials

Relationship of Soil Potassium Forms with Maize Potassium Contents in Soils Derived from Different Parent Materials

Abstract

Understanding of soil potassium (K) dynamics is essential for sustainable crop production. Bioavailability of K depends on forms and distribution within the soil profile. The objectives of this research were to determine which soil K forms control the maize (Zea mays) K contents and compare the extracting capability of sodium tetraphenylborate (NaTPB) with ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) method. Nine soils representing three different parent materials, i.e. loess, sandstone and shale were sampled at three surface genetic horizons. Within each parent material, three soils at varying level of development were selected. Besides basic soil parameters, K was fractioned into water soluble K, exchangeable K, non-exchangeable K, and NaTPB-extracted K. The maize was sown in pots having 2 kg soil from each genetic horizon. Crop was harvested at seven weeks and plant was analysed for K contents. Results show that NaTPB-extracted K gave best correlation as compared to NH4OAc method. This conveys that a non-exchangeable K portion that becomes available to plants can be better estimated by NaTPB method than NH4OAc extraction.




Introduction

Potassium is a macronutrient that affects plant growth, quality of grains and fruits. Potassium plays an essential role in plant metabolism (Ruiz and Romero, 2002). In Pakistan, most soils contain relatively large amounts of K occurring as a structural element of primary minerals, i.e. K-feldspar, muscovite, biotite and illite (Akhtar, 1989), and only a small fraction is present in plant available form. Availability of K is controlled by its release from K bearing minerals (mica, feldspar) and fixation by partially weathered mica and vermiculite, and high charge smectite. Potassium release from soil minerals depends on their contents, types, structural properties and particle size distribution. The structural properties of 2:1 type clay minerals controlling K fixation are layer charge density and charge location. The order of ease of K+ expulsion from different minerals by oxalic and citric acids is biotite > microcline > orthoclase > muscovite (Song and Huang, 1988). Soils that contain partially weathered mica, vermiculite or high charge smectite as the dominant clay minerals are usually low in soil solution K. Whereas NH4+ fertilisation enhances K availability as they occupy K adsorption sites in clay minerals (Kilic et al., 1999).

The clay fraction also comprises kaolinite, montmorillonite, chlorite, and vermiculite (Bajwa, 1989). The soils having sufficient amount of vermiculites and partially weathered mica have capacity to fix an enormous quantity of applied K (Ranjha et al., 1992). The soils of Pakistan have mixed mineralogy. The sand and silt fractions of three Indus river basin soils, i.e. Gujranwala, Peshawar and Lyallpur comprise di and trioctahedral mica, quartz, feldspar and chlorite. Principal minerals in clay fractions are mica, kaolinite and smectite. While chlorite and quartz are also present (Akhtar and Dixon, 2009).

Chemical extractants estimate the fraction of soil K that plant absorbs but do not assess the natural binding strength of soil particles for K or the contributive cations like calcium and magnesium. In addition, the electrolyte concentrations of most chemical extractants used to test soil K are much higher than the soil solute in field soils. Consequently, these high electrolyte concentrations cause an artificial stress on the soil system, resulting indiscriminate extraction of selectively adsorbed K (Herlihy, 1992). Soil K extracted under these circumstances often misrepresents plant-available K, since some of K remain un-extracted due to being non-exchangeable but would have available to plants in case of deficiency.

The widely used chemical tests for plant available K in soils is pH 7, 1M ammonium acetate (Hosseinpur and Samavati, 2008). Ammonium acetate remains most widely used test for plant available K in soil extracts, water soluble and exchangeable K (Cox et al., 1999) and may cause overestimation in case non-exchangeable K is also being extracted. Salts or dilute acids extracts lesser K than those extracted by 1 M NH4OAc method which suggests that the non-exchangeable K in soils cannot be evaluated with weak extractants of salts or dilute acids (Simard and Zizka, 1994; Hosseinpur and Sinegani, 2004). Sodium tetraphenylborate can extract both exchangeable and non-exchangeable K better than NH4OAc (Cox and Joern, 1997; Cox et al., 1999). This advantage can increase accuracy in predicting plant K uptake, especially when plants obtain considerable amounts of K from non-exchangeable forms. On the other hand, some researchers reported that NaTPB has no advantage compared to the traditional methods for assessment of plant available K (Schindler et al., 2002; Fernandez et al., 2008). The effectiveness of solute used for assessment of available soil K seems largely dependent on the non-exchangeable K extracting power and extraction period of the method that different researchers employed. Studies on K extraction through NaTPB, and its comparison with NH4OAc extraction method are very scarce. It is hypothesised that the K extracted by NaTPB may be the better predictor for the bioavailable K than the extracted by other extractants. We sampled soils at different level of development in three different parent materials at three depths level with the purpose of wide range of soil properties. The objectives of the study were to i) assess which soil K forms controls the maize (Zea mays) K contents, ii) to compare the extracting capability of NaTPB method with NH4OAc method and iii) to determine which method is better to predict the available K using maize as a test crop.

Materials and methods

Site description and soil sampling

The study area is a part of Pothwar Plateau, and lies between latitude 32º 35” and 34º 09” N, and longitudes 71º 40” and 72º 59” E. The parent materials of Pothwar Plateau are loess and the residuum from sandstone and shale. The loess is windblown material from sandy plains deposits on Siwalik sandstone and shale in the region during Pleistocene period, sequences of soil series developed in each parent material were included. Soils are developed in loess and outcrops of sandstone and shale. The Kahuta, Balkasar and Qazian soil series, in order of most developed to least developed soils, form a toposequence in sandstone residuum. The Guliana, Rawalpindi and Rajar soil series is a toposequence in loess. The Muree, Ghoragali and Tirnol soil series are a toposequence in shale residuum. The classification and genesis of these soils are given in Table 1. Soil was collected from three surface genetic horizons and air dried, crushed and then passed through 2 mm sieve before analyses.

Soil analysis

The soil properties important for understanding the chemical environment like soil pH and CaCO3 contents were analysed. Soil pH was determined in 1:1 (w:v) ratio soil suspension using a pH meter (model-6071 N; Jenco Electronics, Grand Prairie, TX, USA) after thorough mixing and equilibration of 1 h (Thomas, 1996). Soil calcium carbonate was estimated by CH3COOH consumption (Loeppert et al., 1984).

Soil potassium forms determination

Soil K was fractionated into water soluble K, exchangeable K and non-exchangeable K. Water soluble K was estimated by extracting with deionised water (Jackson, 1973). Exchangeable K was determined by extracting with 1 M NH4OAc solution (Knudsen et al., 1996). Non-exchangeable K was determined by boiling soil in 25 mL 1.0 M HNO3. The digested residues were filtered and concentration of K was quantified on flame photometer (model PFP7; Jenway, Stone, UK) using Pratt (1965) method.

The NaTPB-extractable K was done using the procedure as described by Cox et al. (1999). Briefly, 500 mg soil was putted in 50 mL centrifuge tubes and mixed with 3 mL extractant (NaBPh4 + NaCl + 0.01 mol L–1 EDTA). Mixture was shaken at 200 rpm for 20 min. Later, 25 mL quenching solution (0.5 mol L–1 NH4Cl + 0.14 mol L–1 CuCl2) was added to the tubes to stop the further extraction of soil K. The tubes were heated in water bath for 60 min to dissolve the KBPH4 precipitates. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and filtrate was analysed for K by using the procedure described earlier.

Pot experiment and plant potassium concentration determination

About 2 kg of the soil selected from each horizon was packed in pots. Five uniform weight seeds of maize variety Kashmir gold were sown in each pot. The seedlings were thinned to two plants per pot one week after germination and irrigated with distilled deionised water. Each pot received 200 mg kg–1 nitrogen, 50 mg kg–1 phosphorus, 123 mg kg–1 boron, 200 mg kg–1 zinc and 310 mg kg–1 iron. Seven-week old plant was harvested, oven dried at 65°C, and whole plant (including root and shoot) weighed for biomass. The dry plant material was grounded to powder for elemental analysis. Dry ashing of plant material was done in porcelain crucibles in a muffle furnace at 550°C and ash was dissolved in hydrochloric acid. Aliquot was used for K determination using flame photometer (Chapman and Pratt, 1961).

Statistical analysis

Soil K extracted with different extractants, and plant K were statistically analysed by multivariate analysis of variance (SAS version 9), where a value in depth-1 to depth-3 dependent upon parent material and soil nested within parent material. Means for soil within parent material and their interactions were compared using t-test (P≤0.05). Correlations between the soil K forms and plant K were drawn. The statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.

Results and discussion

Soil characteristics

Most soils were dark brown to yellowish brown in color except that of shale derived soils being reddish to reddish-brown. The young soils were calcareous without a zone of lime accumulation while the soils at relatively higher development stage were decalcified to variable depths with a distinct zone of lime accumulation. Most soils had pH greater than 7.0. Soils that are relatively more developed had low pH at the top, while the young soils had uniform pH throughout the profile depth (Table 2). Low pH at surface in more developed soils is due to decalcification in soils at higher stage of development (Akhtar et al., 2014; Mehmood et al., 2015) while uniform pH throughout the soil profile depth is due to almost uniform calcite distribution in the soil profiles of slightly weathered or young soils (Jamil et al., 2016).

Water-soluble potassium

Water-soluble K represents the portion of K that can be directly removed from the soil solution by plants. The results showed that water soluble K ranged from 12 to 73 mg kg–1 in the loess soils, 13 to 60 mg kg–1 in the sandstone soils and 64 to 100 mg kg–1 in the shale soils. The hypothesis of non-significant depth × parent material effect was accepted through MANOVA test criteria (Wilks’ Lambda P>0.30) suggesting that the difference in parent materials remained statistically nonsignificant at all horizon levels (Figure 1A).

Water-soluble K contents were higher in surface soil across all the parent material soils. High values of water soluble K at surface horizons could might be attributed to the relatively higher amount of organic matter. The shale-derived soils had greater amount of water soluble K as compare to loess and sandstone at all depths. The soil at advance stage of development in shale, i.e. Murree soil series had slightly larger amount of K than the soil at the early stage of development (Ghoragali soil series). Whereas in the sandstone and the loess, the soils at less and moderate development stage had more water-soluble K and soluble K increased toward the soil surface in all soils (Table 3). The hypothesis of no depth × soil (parent material) effect was accepted through MANOVA test criteria (Wilks’ Lambda P>0.72). The water soluble K was highly and positively correlated with exchangeable K (r2 0.97). Similar results were also reported by Bhaskar et al. (2001), Srinivassarao et al. (2002), Setia and Sharma (2004). The better correlation of water soluble K with other forms indicates that the water soluble K was governed by the other forms of K like exchangeable and total K.

Exchangeable potassium

Exchangeable K fraction is portion of K that is retained by the cation exchange sites on soil particles. Exchangeable K is in equilibrium with the soil solution K and may rapidly replenish the soil solution as K is removed. The exchangeable K ranged from 19 to 130 mg kg–1 in the loess soils, 21 to 77 mg kg–1 in the sandstone soils and 88 to 154 mg kg–1 in the shale soils. The hypothesis of non-significant depth × parent material effect was accepted through MANOVA test criteria. Though magnitude of difference among the parent materials at various depths varied, however difference remained statistically similar at all horizon levels.

Exchangeable K in all three parent material derived soils followed the same decreasing trend with depth (Figure 1B). Further, the soils at higher stage of development in shale had higher content of exchangeable K than the soils at the early stage of development, whereas in sandstone and loess soils, the less developed soils had greater exchangeable K at all depths. Exchangeable K increased towards the soil surface (Table 3) and the hypothesis of no depth × soil (parent material) effect was accepted through MANOVA test criteria. The soils from three parent materials had drastically different textures. The shale-derived soils retain greater exchangeable K due to high clay content. Exchangeable K concentration differed significantly with the stage of soil development whereas it was nonsignificant with the depth. The less developed stages of loess Rajar and Rawalpindi had significantly greater exchangeable K than the highly developed Guliana soils. Same thing was observed in sandstone where less developed Qazian soils had more exchangeable K than the more developed Balkassar and Kahuta soils. The highest K concentration in the coarse fractions is attributed to the presence of biotite, muscovite and feldspar. The decrease in exchangeable K with development suggests reflects the depletion of K reserves.

Non-exchangeable potassium

The fraction of soil K extracted by boiling HNO3 is referred as non-exchangeable K, which is trapped in the wedge structure of partially weathered mica and becomes available for plants uptake at last depletion stage, was highest in loess and lowest in sandstone derived soils. The difference among the parent materials remained statistically constant at all horizon level (Figure 1C) supported by the non-significant hypothesis of depth × parent material effect through MANOVA test criteria (Wilks’ Lambda P>0.12). The non-exchangeable K increased toward soil surface in all parent materials because of uptake of K by plants from lower horizons and continuous sedimentation of fresh mineral and organic materials through irrigation and eolian dust deposits on the soil surface. The sandstone is mostly composed of quartz, whereas the loess contains mica and K feldspar (Akhtar and Dixon, 2009). The soils at an early stage of development release more non-exchangeable K than highly weathered soils due to the presence of weatherable minerals (Pratt, 1951). The soils at early stage of development had a larger amount of non-exchangeable K than the soils at the higher stage of development because of occurrence of large amount of mica in less developed and younger soils. The non-exchangeable K increased toward the soil surface with a greater magnitude of difference in more weathered soils (Table 3). The hypothesis of no depth × soil (parent material) effect was accepted by MANOVA test criteria. The loess-derived soils had significantly greater amount of non-exchangeable K as compared to shale and sandstone at all depths.

Sodium tetraphenylborate extractable potassium

The NaTPB extracts plant available K from soil that includes non-exchangeable and exchangeable K. This K fraction was recorded in the range of 543 to 1630 mg kg–1 in the loess soils, 217 to 1195 mg kg–1 in the sandstone soils and 435 to 1740 mg kg–1 in the shale soils. The hypothesis of non-significant depth × parent material effect was accepted by MANOVA test criteria implying that the difference in parent materials remained statistically significant at all horizon levels (Figure 1D). The NaTPB can extract fixed interlayer K from micaceous minerals as it maintains an extremely low K concentration in a soil solution thereby accelerating the exchange of interlayer K. This process resembles the removal of K from mica that may occur in the K depleted soil solution in the rhizosphere (Hinsinger et al., 1993). However, NaTPB is quite ineffective in removing K from the three-dimensional structure of K-feldspar (Song and Huang, 1988).

The soils at early stage of development had a larger amount of K than the soils at the higher stage of development and the NaTPB extracted K increased toward the soil surface. The loess-derived soils had significantly greater amount of NaTPB-extracted K as compared to shale and sandstone at all depths (Table 3). The hypothesis of no depth × soil (parent material) effect was accepted through MANOVA test criteria. The analysis result showed that NaTPB extracts greater amount of K as compared to other methods. The NaTPB method has the potential of describing the plant available K status of soils more completely as compare to the other methods. The NaTPB-extracted K is a better indicator of plant K uptake than 1 M NH4OAc extracted K because of the later’s inability to measure plant available non exchangeable K (Cox and Joern, 1996). The extent and rate of K release to NaTPB from the soil clays are highly dependent on the clay mineralogy. The amounts and rates of K release from illite-containing clay are much higher than for clay containing only kaolinite with or without inhibited vermiculite (Darunsontaya et al., 2010).

Plant potassium concentration and uptake

Potassium concentration in maize plants ranged from 450 to 1740 mg kg–1 on the loess soils, 15 to 900 mg kg–1 on the sandstone soils and 300 to 1400 mg kg–1 on the shale soils. It is apparent that plants grown on loess soils were able to extract more K. The hypothesis of non-significant depth × parent material effect was accepted by MANOVA test criteria suggesting that the difference in K concentration at corresponding depth remained statistically same for the parent materials. Potassium concentration increased toward the surface in all parent materials when averaged over different soils in each parent material separately (Figure 2A). Particle size of K minerals and their structural characteristics influence the K release from soil minerals (Huang, 2005). The sandstone is mostly composed of quartz and contains lesser weatherable minerals. The loess contains greater mica and K-feldspar. Shale contains fewer and lesser crystalline biotite. Trioctahedral mica minerals such as biotite and phlogopite release K more readily than dioctahedral such as muscovite (Fanning et al., 1989). Fine particles undergo layer weathering which results in rapid release of K whereas large-size particles undergo edge weathering and proceed slowly to completely vermiculitised (Huang, 2005).

The hypothesis of no depth × soil (parent material) was accepted through MANOVA test criteria (Wilks’ Lambda P>0.57) implying that the soils at different development stages do not differ drastically in K supply. In all the three parent material soils, the plants that were sown in first horizon soils had more K concentration compared to the second and third horizon as K concentration in plants decrease with depth (Table 3). Further, the plants sown in soils at higher stage of development in loess had larger amount of K than soil at the early stage of development, whereas plants sown in sandstone and shale soils had more K concentration in the less developed soils.

The K uptake of plants ranged from 1 to 30 mg kg–1 in loess soils, 0.1 to 9 mg kg–1 in sandstone soils and 1 to 20 mg kg–1 soils on shale soils. Plants differ in their ability to take up K depending on several factors, these factors are soil factors as well as plant factors, the soil factors include CEC, soil moisture, available and non-exchangeable K content of soil etc., whereas plant factors include hybrid and plant population. The plants in first horizon soils uptake more K followed by second and third horizon soils (Table 3). The first horizon plants of shale uptake more K followed by loess and sandstone, whereas in second horizon the plants of loess uptake large amount of K as compare to shale and sandstone because the mica content of loess is more weathered and other soils had mica in crystalline form.

Relationship of plant potassium with potassium extracted with different extractants

The K concentration in plant and K uptake by plant better correlated with NaTPB-extracted K (R2 0.703 and 0.329) than with NH4OAc-extracted K (R2 0.129 and 0.087) in all soils, respectively (Figures 3 and 4, Table 4). This confirms that a non-exchangeable K portion is only assessable to NaTPB test but not to NH4OAc. According to Mengel and Uhlenbecker (1993), this non-exchangeable K trapped between interlayer of clay minerals is a major source of K for plants grown on many soils. The availability of non-exchangeable K depends primarily on the release rate of K from the interlayer of clay minerals. Besides illite, the K fixing capacity also seemed to have its influence on non-exchangeable K release. These relationships indicate that plants uptake solution K then exchangeable K is available to plants. The non-exchangeable K was not readily available but when solution K is depleted then non-exchangeable K can be a source of K for plants that maintains the solution concentration after exchangeable K. The NaTPB method has the potential of describing the plant-available K status of soils more completely than does soil test K, exchangeable K or extractable K.

Conclusions

The correlation between NaTPB-extracted K and plant K concentration and uptake was stronger than with the NH4OAc-extracted K method. The study reveals that a non-exchangeable K fraction may become available to plants that can only be estimated by NaTPB method. In conclusion, the NaTPB method has an advantage over the NH4OAc method for the assessment of the plant available K.

References

1 

MS Akhtar, 1989. Soil mineralogy and potassium quantity/ intensity relations in the alluvial soils from Pakistan. Degree Diss., Texas A&M University College, Station TX, USA.

2 

MS Akhtar, JB Dixon, 2009. Mineralogical characteristics and potassium quantity/intensity relation in three Indus River basin soils. Asian J. Chem. 21:3427-42.

3 

MS Akhtar, M Imran, A Mehmood, M Memon, S Rukh, GS Kiani, 2014. Apatite loss in Pothwar Loess Plain (Pakistan) fits a simple linear reservoir model. Pedosphere 24:763-75.

4 

MF Bajwa, 1989. Potassium mineralogy of Pakistani soils and its effect on potassium response. Proc. Workshop on the Role of Potassium in Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency. National Fertilizer Development Center, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 203-16.

5 

BP Bhaskar, S Vadivelu, U Baruah, PS Bhutte, DP Dutta, 2001. Distribution of potassium forms and chars and marshy soils of Brahmaputra valley, Jorhat district, Assam. J. Potassium Res. 17:39-47.

6 

HD Chapman, PF Pratt, 1961. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and water. University of California, Berkely, CA, USA.

7 

AE Cox, BC Joern, 1996. Predicting plant available potassium using a modified sodium tetraphenylboron method. Proc. North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. Vol. 12. St. Louis, MI, USA, pp. 70-81.

8 

AE Cox, BC Joern, 1997. Release kinetics of nonexchangeble potassium in soils using sodium tetraphenylboron. Soil Sci. 162:588-98.

9 

AE Cox, BC Joern, SM Brounder, D Gao, 1999. Plant-available potassium assessment with a modified sodium tetraphenylboron method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:902-11.

10 

T Darunsontaya, A Suddhiprakarn, I Kheoruenromne, RJ Gilkes, 2010. A comparison of extraction methods to assess potassium availability for Thai upland soils. Proc. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1-4.

11 

DS Fanning, VZ Keramidas, MA El-Desoky, 1989. Micas. In: J.B. Dixon, S.B. Weed (eds.) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 551-634.

12 

FG Fernandez, SM Brouder, CA Beyrouty, R Hoyum, 2008. Assessment of plant-available potassium for no-till, rainfed soybean. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:1085-95.

13 

M Herlihy, 1992. Field evaluation of soil tests for K: quantity, intensity, EUF-K and other soil properties. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23:2295-12.

14 

P Hinsinger, F Elsass, B Jaillard, M Robert, 1993. Root-induced irreversible transformation of trioctahedral mica in the rhizosphere of rape. J. Soil Sci. 44:535-45.

15 

A Hosseinpour, AAS Sinegani, 2004. Evaluating garlic available potassium with chemical extractants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35:2147-59.

16 

AR Hosseinpur, M Samavati, 2008. Evaluation of chemical extractants for the determination of available potassium. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 39:1559-70.

17 

PM Huang, 2005. Chemistry of potassium in soils. In: M.A. Tabatabai, D.L. Sparks (eds.) Chemical processes in soils. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 227-92.

18 

ML Jackson, 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., New Delhi, India.

19 

S Jamil, A Mehmood, MS Akhter, M Memon, M Imran, S Rukh, A Qayyum, MA Jenks, 2016. Changes in soil phosphorus fractions across a toposequence in the estuary plains of Pakistan. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 62:1567-77.

20 

K Kilic, MR Derici, K Saltali, 1999. The ammonium fixation in great soil groups of Tokat Region and some factors affecting the fixation I. The affect of potassium on ammonium fixation. Turk. J. Agric. For. 23:673-8.

21 

D Knudsen, GA Peterson, PF Pratt, 1996. Lithium, Sodium and Potassium. In: A.L. Page (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 403-29.

22 

RH Leoppert, CT Hallmark, MM Koshy, 1984. Routine procedure for rapid determination of soil carbonates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1030-33.

23 

A Mehmood, MS Akhtar, KS Khan, A Khalid, M Imran, S Rukh, 2015. Relationship of Phosphorus Uptake with its Fractions in Different Soil Parent Materials. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 4:46-53.

24 

K Mengel, K Uhlenbecker, 1993. Determination of available interlayer potassium and its uptake by ryegrass. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:761-66.

25 

PF Pratt, 1951. Potassium removal from Iowa soils by greenhouse and laboratory procedures. Soil Sci. 72:107-18.

26 

PF Pratt, 1965. Potassium. In: C.A. Black (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 1023-31.

27 

AM Ranjha, SM Mehdi, RH Qureshi, 1992. Potassium behavior in some alluvial soil series of Pakistan. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 30:101-10.

28 

JM Ruiz, L Romero, 2002. Relationship between potassium fertilization and nitrate assimilation in leaves and fruits of cucumber (cucumis sativus) plants. Annal. Appl. Boil. 140:241-5.

29 

F V Schindler, HJ Woodard, JJ Doolittle, 2002. Plant available potassium assessment through chemical prediction methods. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33:1473-84.

30 

RK Setia, KN Sharma, 2004. Vertical distribution of chemical pools of potassium and their relationship with potassium nutrition of wheat under long-term differential fertilization. J. Indian. Soc. Soil Sci. 55:469-72.

31 

RR Simard, J Zizka, 1994. Evaluating plant available potassium with strontium citrate. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25:1779-89.

32 

SK Song, PM Huang, 1988. Dynamics of potassium release from potassium-bearing minerals as influenced by oxalic and citric acids. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:383-90.

33 

CA Srinivassarao, N Ganeshamurthy, M Ali, RN Singh, KK Singh, 2002. Distribution of different forms of potassium in different pulse growing regions of India. J. Potassium. Res. 18:23-30.

34 

GW Thomas, 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 475-90.

Figure 1.

Vertical distribution of soluble potassium (A), exchangeable potassium (B), non-exchangeable potassium (C), and sodium tetraphenylborate potassium (D) in selected three parent material soils; error bars show the standard error.

ija-12-2-818-g001.jpg
Figure 2.

Vertical distribution of potassium concentration in plant (A) and potassium uptake (B); error bars show the standard error.

ija-12-2-818-g002.jpg
Figure 3.

Relationship between plant potassium concentrations (mg kg–1) and different potassium forms extracted with different extractants (mg kg–1).

ija-12-2-818-g003.jpg
Figure 4.

Relationship between plant potassium uptake (mg kg–1) and different potassium forms extracted with different extractants (mg kg–1).

ija-12-2-818-g004.jpg
Table 1.

Selected soils in different soil parent materials with United States Department of Agriculture soil classification.

Parent material Soil series USDA soil classification
Loess Rajar Typic ustorthents
Rawalpindi Udic haplustepts
Guliana Typic haplustafls
Sandstone (residuum) Qazian Lithic ustipsamments
Balkasar Typic haplustalfs
Kahuta Udic haplustalfs
Shale (residuum) Ghoragalli Typic udorthents
Tirnul Typic haplustepts
Murree Typic hapludolls

[i] USDA, United States Department of Agriculture.

Table 2.

Basic soil properties variation with depth in soils at different development stage in selected parent materials.

Parent material Soil series Horizon Soil texture Soil pH (%) CaCO3 (%)
Loess Guliana Ap Silt loam 7.20 (0.46) 1.20 (0.23)
Bw Silty clay loam 7.40 (0.35) 1.00 (0.20)
Bt Silty clay 7.50 (0.34) 1.20 (0.10)
Rawalpindi Ap Silt loam 7.10 (0.44) 0.95 (0.21)
Bw Silt loam 7.40 (0.30) 0.75 (0.33)
Btk Silty clay loam 7.30 (0.39) 1.55 (0.25)
Rajar Ap Silt loam 8.20 (0.30) 14.10 (0.32)
Bw Silt loam 8.00 (0.10) 16.50 (0.06)
BC Silt loam 8.15 (0.08) 17.70 (0.80)
Sandstone Kahuta Ap Sandy loam 6.90 (0.51) 0.55 (0.08)
Bw Sandy clay loam 6.95 (0.54) 0.60 (0.04)
Bt Sandy clay loam 7.05 (0.41) 0.60 (0.09)
Balksar Ap Loam 7.65 (0.11) 1.90 (0.72)
Bw Clay loam 7.60 (0.15) 1.80 (0.08)
Bt Clay loam 7.60 (0.24) 3.20 (2.57)
Qazian Ap Sandy loam 7.60 (0.06) 8.85 (0.72)
Bw Sandy loam 7.60 (0.08) 10.15 (0.08)
BC Sandy loam 7.60 (0.13) 14.45 (4.3)
Shale Murree A Silty clay loam 6.55 (0.45) 0.94 (0.21)
Bw Silty clay 6.30 (1.30) 1.00 (0.33)
Bt Silty clay 6.40 (1.30) 0.80 (0.25)
Tirnul Ap Clay loam 7.60 (0.12) 13.30 (0.92)
Bw Clay loam 7.40 (0.10) 11.10 (2.34)
Bk Silty clay 7.55 (0.17) 8.80 (2.46)
Ghoragali A Silty clay loam 7.20 (0.38) 15.5 (2.48)
Bw Silty clay loam 7.45 (0.14) 14.05 (4.3)
BC Silty clay 7.55 (0.16) 14.30 (3.4)
Table 3.

Distribution of soil potassium (mg kg1) forms extracted using different extractants with depth in soils at different development stages in selected parent materials.

Parent material Soil series Horizon Soluble K (SD) Exchangeable K (SD) Non-exchangeable K (SD) NaTPB K (SD)
Loess Guliana Ap 37(7) 56(4) 1429(208) 1522(196)
Bw 22(4) 35(7) 1066(118) 1123(113)
Bt 16(2) 23(3) 975(225) 1014(220)
Rawalpindi Ap 67(4) 113(9) 980(289) 1159(279)
Bw 58(1) 88(13) 869(146) 1014(220)
Btk 48(4) 60(9) 798(159) 906(157)
Rajar Ap 48(12) 73(16) 1364(122) 1486(113)
Bw 28(1) 43(2) 979(156) 1051(157)
BC 28(2) 39(1) 875(137) 942(139)
Sandstone Kahuta Ap 27(4) 42(7) 728(264) 797(257)
Bw 16 (0) 27(1) 609(55) 652(47)
Bt 17(2) 26(1) 356(81) 399(83)
Balksar Ap 24(5) 36(7) 882(82) 942(130)
Bw 19 (0) 29 (0) 460(83) 507(83)
Bt 15(1) 26(2) 249(28) 290(31)
Qazian Ap 45(9) 60(10) 656(203) 761(188)
Bw 30(5) 46(8) 467(44) 543(55)
BC 23(3) 42(4) 442(120) 507(110)
Shale Murree A 95(3) 142(6) 1068(329) 1304(330)
Bw 94(3) 140(6) 926(179) 1159(175)
Bt 91(3) 136(4) 788(187) 1014(191)
Tirnul Ap 89(5) 132(3) 902(336) 1123(332)
Bw 88(5) 116 (0) 774(286) 978(288)
Bk 74(4) 98(5) 734(273) 906(270)
Ghoragali A 89(2) 139(2) 1113(116) 1341(113)
Bw 81(2) 127(1) 661(10) 870(15)
BC 73(1) 130(1) 848(221) 1051(229)

[i] Soluble K, potassium extracted with deionised water; SD, standard deviation; exchangeable K, potassium extracted with 1 M ammonium acetate; non-exchangeable K, potassium extracted with boiling nitric acid; NaTPB K, potassium extracted with sodium tetraphenylborate.

Table 4.

Distribution of plant potassium concentration and uptake with depth in soils at different development stages in selected parent materials.

Parent material Soil series Horizon Plant K concentration (mg kg–1 dry matter) (SD) Plant K uptake (mg kg–1 soil) (SDK)
Loess Guliana Ap 1357(198) 26(8)
Bw 841(189) 13(3)
Bt 613(85) 12(3)
Rawalpindi Ap 853(241) 12(2)
Bw 1246(438) 14(2)
Btk 660(106) 13(1)
Rajar Ap 1210(76) 27(14)
Bw 759(135) 17(6)
BC 724(155) 16(6)
Sandstone Kahuta Ap 499(43) 14(5)
Bw 472 (0) 6(1)
Bt 77(43) 2 (0)
Balksar Ap 666(174) 8(3)
Bw 297(62) 6(1)
Bt 165(43) 1 (0)
Qazian Ap 472(172) 8(3)
Bw 349(70) 6(1)
BC 232(37) 5(1)
Shale Murree A 885(216) 26(9)
Bw 806(210) 9(3)
Bt 727(217) 9(3)
Tirnul Ap 1093(299) 24(2)
Bw 707(192) 12 (0)
Bk 730(286) 11(5)
Ghoragali A 1298(201) 26(9)
Bw 630(154) 12(5)
BC 402(98) 5(2)

[i] Plant K concentration, potassium concentration in dry matter of maize plant; SD, standard deviation; plant K uptake, potassium uptake from one kg of soil by maize plant was obtained by multiplying dry matter with plant potassium concentration.

Abstract views:
1017

Views:
PDF
307
HTML
382

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2017 Ayaz Mehmood, Rashid Mehmood Butt, Mohammad Saleem Akhtar, Muhammad Imran, Shah Rukh, Ghashiya Sattar Kayani, Muhammad Tariq Siddique, Kashif Sarfraz Abbasi, Abdul Qayyum, Zahoor Ahmed

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2017     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185