Energy, Nutrient and Economic Cross Indicators of Cropping Systems in Northern Italy

Abstract

Agro-ecological indicators are useful tools to provide synthetic representations of agricultural systems. Simple indicators can be combined to calculate cross indicators, for example efficiencies, calculated as a ratio between two simple indicators. In sustainability studies, efficiency is frequently calculated in energy terms (energy output / energy input); however, other “output” and “input” terms can be used. In this study, we evaluated how the ranking of systems changes when different metrics of agricultural production (economic gross margin vs. energy output) and resource use (nutrients inputs and surpluses, fossil energy inputs, economic costs) are used. The calculations were carried out for a study area in northern Italy (Sud Milano Agricultural Park), characterised by intensively cultivated arable cropping systems (cereals and forage crops). Crop types were ranked differently when metrics changed. In general, maize (a highly productive crop) had good performances when evaluated using the output / input energy ratio, while rice was good when we used the ratios based on gross margin. When energy or monetary outputs were divided by N surplus, all crop types had very similar median values, suggesting a common energetic and economic efficiency of N use. Overall, different cross indicators may provide a different representation of the system studied. This means that it is not possible to provide a unique synthetic evaluation of sustainability, which instead depends on the indicator(s) chosen.We conclude that it is very important to clarify the objective of sustainability studies and to select accordingly the most adequate indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-03-31
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Efficiency, fossil energy, nutrient balance, sustainability assessment, variable cost.
Statistics
Abstract views: 496

PDF: 257
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Castoldi, N., & Bechini, L. (2010). Energy, Nutrient and Economic Cross Indicators of Cropping Systems in Northern Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 5(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2010.19