Study of different herbicide molecules for the control of durum wheat weed

  • Michele Perniola | mikimos@mac.com
  • Stella Lovelli
  • Teodoro Di Tommaso
  • Tommaso Caponio
  • Vittorio Filì

Abstract

In order to enhance the chances to rotate the herbicide molecules, the effectiveness of a new molecule, pinoxaden, was tested, comparing it with other herbicides used in wheat weed control. The trial was carried out comparing the following herbicide mixtures: 1) no weed control treatment; 2) Tribenuron Methyl (TM); 3) Clodinafop (C); 4) Tribenuron Methyl + Clodinafop (TM+C); 5) Pinoxaden + clodinafop + propargile (PCP); 6) Pinoxaden + clodinafop + propargile + Triasulfuron (PCP+T); 7) Pinoxaden + clodinafop + propargile + absolute Ioxinil and Mecoprop (PCP+IM). The new PCP+T herbicides mixture didn’t differ statistically from the traditional TMC treatment in terms of effectiveness, but the agronomic result of the new mixture was totally satisfactory, even taking into account that the marketing of this mixture is not aimed to compete with other existing herbicides but to widen the chance to rotate active principles in time and space, in order to control the onset of resistance phenomena.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-07-10
Section
Original Articles
Statistics
Abstract views: 567

PDF: 202
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Perniola, M., Lovelli, S., Di Tommaso, T., Caponio, T., & Filì, V. (2008). Study of different herbicide molecules for the control of durum wheat weed. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 3(2s), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2010.s2.59