La risorsa alimentare globale e la capacità della scienza di superare i limiti attuali: Malthus ha ancora torto?

Submitted: 27 June 2011
Accepted: 12 September 2011
Published: 23 September 2011
Abstract Views: 837
PDF: 642
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

More than two centuries ago, T.R. Malthus postulated the human reproductive capacity being higher than the earth’s feeding capacity. As last decades’ population growth proved Malthus theory wrong, experts agree that this can be attributed to the application of technology in agriculture, leading to a significant enhancement of unit yields (first green revolution). However, heavy social and environmental costs were paid to reach such stunning achievements; moreover, they have seemingly gained a steady level, owing to increasing pressure of several limiting factors (e.g., soils, water, and nutrients availability; global change, etc.). Malthus prediction is therefore still relevant when trying to match population growth and food availability: the time seems ripe to launch a second green revolution, focused on lowimpact, easily accessible technologies.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Giuseppe Zerbi, Università degli Studi di Udine
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali
Paolo Ceccon, Università degli Studi di Udine
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali

How to Cite

Zerbi, G., & Ceccon, P. (2011). La risorsa alimentare globale e la capacità della scienza di superare i limiti attuali: Malthus ha ancora torto?. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 6(s2), e2. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.6.s2.e2