The intersection of integrated pest management and soil quality in the resistant weed era

Submitted: 16 March 2021
Accepted: 25 June 2021
Published: 3 September 2021
Abstract Views: 1538
PDF: 346
HTML: 11
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Audrey V. Gamble Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department, Auburn University, and National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Auburn, AL, United States.
  • Andrew J. Price priceaj@auburn.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-7603 Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Department, Auburn University, and National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Auburn, AL, United States.

Agricultural producers and scientists have long recognized both beneficial and detrimental aspects of soil tillage. With the development and adoption of herbicide-resistant crops, particularly glyphosate-resistant crops, herbicides such as glyphosate replaced the need for tillage either before or after crop planting. Thus, tillage has become less important for weed management and has been a primary enabler for the success of the majority of conservation production systems. Currently, herbicide-resistant and troublesome weeds are continually challenging agricultural decisions throughout the world. Conservation tillage hectarage is at constant risk of being converted to higher-intensity tillage systems due to lack of weed control. The shift to higher-intensity tillage facilitates the burial of weed seed through the use of inversion tillage and/or of surface tillage to facilitate pre-plant incorporated and pre-emergence herbicides for control of herbicide-resistant or troublesome weeds, especially in non-irrigated production. For example, Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) has become the dominant weed problem in United States row crop production because of evolved resistance to glyphosate. Inversion tillage was clearly demonstrated to be an effective tool in helping the management of this weed. However, there is no question that most tillage operations promote soil loss, adversely affect (lower) surface water quality, and negatively impact soil productivity. Depending on the severity of the herbicide-resistant or troublesome weed infestation, multiple strategies involving the integration of cultural and chemical weed control will be needed to overcome the need for tillage. Utilizing high biomass conservation tillage systems, such as those used extensively in South America and introduced to the United States, can help reduce the emergence of weeds by suppressing weed germination and growth. A dense mat is formed on the soil surface when the winter cover crop is planted early and managed for maximum growth. Because weed emergence and growth are suppressed by the physical barrier and shading provided by the residue, more residue increases weed control. Conservation tillage systems that minimize soil disturbance (direct seeding or minimum tillage) can further reduce weed seed germination. In addition, allelopathy plays a role in weed suppression, but quantifying allelopathic effects in applied research is rarely accomplished. Creative research programs have been developed that meet conservation compliance requirements and, at the same time, judiciously use tillage as an element for the management of resistant or troublesome species. Similar programs are needed to help manage herbicide-resistant or troublesome weed species in other regions and cropping systems. Further research is critically needed when few or no other options are available to ensure the economic viability of farming operations while addressing long-term soil quality concerns.

Highlights
- Conservation tillage hectarage is at constant risk of being converted to higher-intensity tillage systems due to lack of weed control.
- Most tillage operations promote soil loss, adversely affect surface water quality, and negatively impact soil productivity.
- Creative research programs have been developed that meet conservation compliance requirements and, at the same time, judiciously use tillage as an element for the management of resistant or troublesome species.
- Further research is critically needed when few or no other options are available to ensure the economic viability of farming operations while addressing long-term soil quality concerns.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Arriaga FJ, Balkcom KS, 2006. Benefits of conservation tillage on rainfall and water management. In: K.J. Hatcher (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference, April 25-27, 2005.
Ashford DL, Reeves DW, 2003. Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 18:37-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA2003037
Balkcom KS, Arriaga FJ, van Santen E, 2013. Conservation systems to enhance soil carbon sequestration in the Southeast U.S. Coastal Plain. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77:1774-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0034
Balkcom KS, Duzy LM, Kornecki TS, Price AJ, 2015. Termination of cover crops in the southeast: management considerations for the subsequent cash crop. Crop Forage Turf. Manage. 1:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2015.0161
Budiman M, Malone BP, McBratney AB, Angers DA, Arrouays D, Chambers A, Chaplot V, Chen Z, Cheng K, Das BS, Field DJ, Gimona A, Hedley CB, Hong SY, Mandal B, Marchant BP, Martin M, McConkey BG, Mulder VL, O’Rourke S, Richer-de-Forges AC, Odeh I, Padarian J, Paustian K, Pan G, Poggio L, Savin I, Stolbovoy V, Stockmann U, Sulaeman Y, Tsui C, Vågen T, van Wesemael B, Winowiecki L, 2017. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292:59-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
Cillis D, Maestrini B, Pezzuolo A, Marinello F, Sartori L, 2018. Modelling soil organic carbon and carbon dioxide emissions in different tillage systems supported by precision agriculture technologies under current climatic conditions. Soil Till. Res. 183:51-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.001
CTIC, 2020. Report of the 2019-20 National Cover Crop Survey. Joint publication of the Conservation Technology Information Center, the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, and the American Seed Trade Association, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Available from: https://www.ctic.org/data/Cover_Crops_Research_and_Demonstration_Cover_Crop_Survey#:~:text=2019%2D2020%20Cover%20Crop%20Survey&text=Among%20farmers%20who%20planted%20green,and%202.6%25%20in%20spring%20wheat.
Derpsch R, Roth CH, Sidiras N, Ko¨pke U. 1991. Controle da erosa˜o no Parana´, Brazil: Sistemas de cobertura do solo, plantio directo e prepare conservacionista do solo. Deutsche Gesellschaft fu¨ r Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.
Duke SO, 2015. Perspectives on transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops in the United States almost 20 years after introduction. Pest Manage. Sci. 71:652-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3863
Franzluebbers AJ, 2010. Achieving soil organic carbon sequestration with conservation agricultural systems in the southeastern United States. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74:347-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0079
Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA, 2008. Early response of soil organic fractions to tillage and integrated crop-livestock production. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:613-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0121
Gebhardt MR, Daniel TC, Schweizer EE, Allmaras RR, 1985. Conservation tillage. Science 230:625-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.230.4726.625
Green JM, 2012. The benefits of herbicide-resistant crops. Pest Manage. Sci. 68:1323-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3374
Hawkins GL, Kelton J, Smith N, Balkcom K, 2016. A note on comparing rate of soil moisture loss for conventional and conservation tillage production methods for peanut. Peanut Sci. 43:168-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3146/PS16-4.1
Heller H, Bar-Tal A, Tamir G, Bloom P, Venterea RT, Chen D, Zhang Y, Clapp CE, Fine P, 2010. Effects of manure and cultivation on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions from a corn field under Mediterranean conditions. J. Environ. Qual. 39:437-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0027
Heap I, 2015. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available from: http://www.weedscience.org Accessed: November 2015.
Kornecki TS, Arriaga FJ, 2011. Impact of different cover crops and types of transplanter mounted subsoiler shanks on tomato yield. HortSci. 46:715-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.5.715
Koskinen WC, McWhorter CG, 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365-70.
Legere A, Stevenson FC, Benoit DL, 2011. The selective memory of weed seedbanks after 18 years of conservation tillage. Weed Sci. 59:98-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-10-00092.1
Lyon DJ, Young FL, 2015. Integration of weed management and tillage practices in spring barley production. Weed Technol. 29:367-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00144.1
Norsworthy JK, Ward SM, Shaw DR, Llewellyn RS, Nichols RL, Webster TM, Bradley KW, Frisvold G, Powles SB, Burgos NR, Witt WW, Barrett M, 2012. Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: Best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 60:31-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00155.1
Nunes MR, Karlen DL, Veum KS, Moorman TB, Cambardella CA, 2020. Biological soil health indicators respond to tillage intensity: A US meta-analysis. Geoderma 369:114335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114335
Omonode RA, Vyn TJ, Smith DR, Hegymegi P, Gál A, 2007. Soil carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from long-term tillage systems in continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations. Soil Till. Res. 95:182-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.12.004
Price AJ, Arriaga FJ, Raper RL, Balkcom KS, Kornecki TS, and Reeves DW, 2009. Comparison of mechanical and chemical winter cereal cover crop termination systems and cotton yield in conservation agriculture. Cotton Sci. 13:238-45.
Price AJ, Balkcom KS, Culpepper SA, Kelton JA, Nichols RL, Schomberg H, 2011. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: A threat to conservation agriculture. J. Soil Water Conserv. 66:265-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.265
Price AJ, Balkcom KS, Duzy LM, Kelton JA, 2012. Herbicide and cover cop residue integration for Amaranth control in conservation agriculture cotton. Weed Technol. 26:490-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00127.1
Price AJ, Reeves DW, Patterson MG, 2006. Evaluation of weed control provided by three winter cereals in conservation-tillage soybean. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 21:159-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005135
Reberg-Horton SC, Grossman JM, Kornecki TS, Meijer AD, Price AJ, Place GT, Webster TM, 2011. Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the Southeast. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 27:41-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000469
Sanderman J, Hengl T, Fiske GJ, 2017. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114:9575-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706103114
Scharlemann JP, Tanner EV, Hiederer R, Kapos V, 2014. Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Manage. 5:81-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77
Shaw D, Culpepper SA, Owen M, Price AJ, Wilson R, 2012. Herbicide-resistant weeds threaten soil conservation gains: finding a balance for soil and farm sustainability. Issue Paper 49. CAST, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Solberg K, 2013. Cover crop fact sheet. Available from: http://www.sfa-mn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Cover-Crop-Fact-Sheet.pdf Accessed: October 2015.
Teasdale JR, 1996. Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:475-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1996.0475
Timmons FL, 2005. A history of weed control in the US and Canada. Weed Sci. 53:748-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2005)053[0748:AHOWCI]2.0.CO;2
Touchton JT, Rickerl DH, Walker RH, Snipes CE, 1984. Winter legumes as a nitrogen source for no-tillage cotton. Soil Till. Res. 4:391-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(84)90038-2
Trimble SW, 1974. Man-induced soil erosion on the southern piedmont: 1700-1970. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA, USA.
Triplett Jr GB, Dick WA, 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agron. J. 100:S-153-S-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0005c
USDA, 2012. Unlock your farm’s potential: Discover the cover. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available from: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1049063.pdf Accessed: October 2015.
USDA, 2015. Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. Economic Research Service. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us.aspx Accessed: 11 November 2015.
Ussiri DAN, Lal R, 2009. Long-term tillage effects on soil carbon storage and carbon dioxide emissions in continuous corn cropping system from an alfisol in Ohio. Soil Till. Res. 104:39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.11.008
Watts DB, Torbert HA, Prior SA, Huluka G, 2010. Long-term tillage and poultry litter impacts soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization and fertility. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74:1239-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0415
White C, Barbercheck M, Dupont T, Finney D, Hamilton A, Hartman D, Hautau M, Hinds J, Hunter M, Kaye J, La Chance J, 2015. Making the most of mixtures: considerations for winter cover crops in temperate climates. Available from: http://articles.extension.org/pages/72973/making-the-most-of-mixtures:-considerations-for-winter-cover-crops-in-temperate-climates#.VkP-m41dEqO Accessed: October 2015.
Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, Sommer R, Verchot LV, 2017. Global sequestration potential of increased organic carbon in cropland soils. Sci. Reports 7:15554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8

How to Cite

Gamble, A. V., & Price, A. J. (2021). The intersection of integrated pest management and soil quality in the resistant weed era. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1875