Stakeholders analysis and engagement to address Water-Ecosystem-Food Nexus challenges in Mediterranean environments: a case study in Italy

Published: 25 October 2023
Abstract Views: 640
PDF: 300
HTML: 60
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


  • Valentina Baratella Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro Agricoltura e Ambiente, Rome, Italy.
  • Tiziana Pirelli Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Politiche e Bioeconomia, Rome, Italy.
  • Raffaele Giordano Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) - Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque (IRSA), Bari, Italy.
  • Alessandro Pagano Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) - Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque (IRSA), Bari, Italy.
  • Ivan Portoghese Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) - Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque (IRSA), Bari, Italy.
  • Manuel Bea Asociación ECOADAPTA, Madrid, Spain.
  • Estrella López-Moya Asociación ECOADAPTA, Madrid, Spain.
  • Antonella Di Fonzo Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Politiche e Bioeconomia, Rome, Italy.
  • Stefano Fabiani Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Politiche e Bioeconomia, Rome, Italy.
  • Silvia Vanino Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro Agricoltura e Ambiente, Rome, Italy.

The Water-Ecosystems-Food Nexus is a powerful framework developed for analyzing complex interlinkages among natural resource domains and overcoming “siloed” management practices. Multi-actor participatory approaches are increasingly recognized in Nexus research as the most effective way to identify trade-off solutions between divergent interests. Despite this acknowledged potential, the active engagement of stakeholders for the co-creation of knowledge is still limited to date, missing the opportunity for innovation processes and policy designs to be grounded in context-specific knowledge and experiences. This paper outlines the methodological framework developed to integrate stakeholder analysis and participatory tools for exploring Nexus challenges in a pilot area in Tarquinia, Italy, where a multi-stakeholder group was set up encompassing several categories at different levels, from policymakers and authorities to farmers and other end users. Systematic methodologies to target, analyze, and actively engage stakeholders were applied and multidomain participatory tools were developed, i.e., Stakeholder Analysis and Mapping, Learning and Action Alliance, Participatory System Dynamic Modelling, which broaden the agreement on potential locally-tailored solutions for sustainable farming practices and integrated management of natural resources. Mutual learning activities, tapping into actors’ deep understanding of specific local dynamics, served to better frame the complexity of the Nexus and build a common understanding of local societal challenges as well as of potential innovations in farming practices, land, and water management. The methodological innovation of integrating stakeholder mapping and analysis with relevant spatial information from participatory activities, provides the fundamental baseline for spatially explicit scenario analysis in the area, ultimately increasing the relevance and transferability of the Nexus findings.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Albrecht TR, Crootof A, Scott CA, 2018. The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A Systematic Review of Methods for Assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13:043002.
Atkinson R, Flint J, 2001. Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies. Soc. Res. Update. 33:1-4.
Baratella V, Trinchera A, 2018. Organosilicone surfactants as innovative irrigation adjuvants: Can they improve water use efficiency and nutrient uptake in crop production? Agric. Water Manag. Elsevier. 204:149-61.
Barraclough AD, Cusens J, Måren IE, 2022. Mapping stakeholder networks for the co-production of multiple ecosystem services: A novel mixed-methods approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 56:101461.
Blasch J, Van der Kroon B, Van Beukering P, Munster R, Fabiani S, Nino P, Vanino S, 2020. Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 49:33-81.
Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z, 2000. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 15:239-46.
Brugnach, M. and Ingram, H., 2012. Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental science & policy, 15(1), pp.60-71.
Bryman A, 2012. Social Research Methods. New York, Oxford University Press.
Burton RJF, 2006. Seeing through the ‘good Farmer's’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘Productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis. 44:195-215.
Butterworth JA, Batchelor C, Moriarty P, Schouten T, Da Silva C, Verhagen J, Bury PJ, Sutherland A, Manning N, Darteh B, Dziegielewska-Geitz M, 2008. Building more effective partnerships for innovation in urban water management. In: Feyen J, Shannon K, Neville M (eds.). Water and Urban Development Paradigms, pp.575-84.
Carmona-Moreno C, Dondeynaz M, Bielder M, 2018. Position Paper on Water, Energy, Food and Ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). EUR 29509 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Chilvers J, Kearnes M, 2016. Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics. In: Chilvers J, Kearnes M (eds). Routledge.
Ciaccia C, Testani E, Fiore A, Iocola I, Di Pierro M, Mele G, Ferlito F, Cutuli M, Montemurro F, Farina R, Ceccarelli D, 2021. Organic Agroforestry Long-Term Field Experiment Designing Trough Actors’ Knowledge towards Food System Sustainability. Sustainability. 13:5532.
Ciaccia C, Di Pierro M, Testani E, Roccuzzo G, Cutuli M, Ceccarelli D, 2019. Participatory research towards food system redesign: Italian case study and perspectives. Sustainability. 11:7138.
Coletta VR, Pagano A, Pluchinotta I, Fratino U, Scrieciu A, Nanu F. and Giordano R, 2021. Causal Loop Diagrams for supporting Nature Based Solutions participatory design and performance assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 280:111668.
De Vito R, Portoghese I, Pagano A, Fratino U, Vurro M, 2017. An index-based approach for the sustainability assessment of irrigation practice based on the water-energy food nexus framework. Adv. Water Resour. 110.
Di Bene C, Baratella V, Trinchera A, Farina RF, Francaviglia R, 2019. Enhancing diversification of cropping systems to minimize agri environmental problems: results of stakeholders’ consultation in Italy. In: First European Conference on Crop Diversification 2019 (ECCD 2019), Budapest, Hungary.
Duggan DE, Farnsworth KD, Kraak SBM, 2013. Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Mar. Policy. 42:56-67.
Duru M, Therond O, 2015. Designing agroecological transitions; A review. Agron. Sustain. Develop. 35:1237-57.
Flammini A, Puri M, Pluschke L, Dubois O, 2014. Walking the Nexus Talk: Assessing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus in the Context of the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative; Climare, Energy and Tenure Division (NRC). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy.
Friedman A, Miles S, 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Galaitsi S, Veysey J, Huber-Lee A, 2018. Where is the Added Value? A Review of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Literature. SEI Working Paper. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
Grimble R, Aglionby J, Quan J, 1994. Tree Resources and Environmental Policy: A Stakeholder Approach. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham.
Grimble R, Wellard K, 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 55:173-93.
Hagemann N, Kirschke S, 2017. Key Issues of Interdisciplinary NEXUS Governance Analyses: Lessons Learned from Research on Integrated Water Resources Management. Resources. 2017;6:9.
Hoolohan C, Larkin A, McLachlan C, Falconer R, Soutar I, Suckling J, Varga L, Haltas I, Druckman A, Lumbroso D, Scott M, Gilmour D, Ledbetter R, McGrane S, Mitchell C, Yu D, 2018. Engaging stakeholders in research to address water-energy-food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustain. Sci. 13:1415-26.
Horlings LG, Nieto-Romero M, Pisters S, Soini K, 2020. Operationalising transformative sustainability science through place-based research: the role of researchers. Sustain. Sci. 15:467-84.
Howarth C, Monasterolo I, 2016. Understanding barriers to decision making in the UK energy-food-water Nexus: The added value of interdisciplinary approaches. Environ. Sci. Policy. pp. 53-60.
Howarth C, Monasterolo I, 2017. Opportunities for knowledge coproduction across the energy-food-water nexus: Making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making. Environ. Sci. Policy. 75:103-10.
Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, Mace GM, 2014. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environ. Change. 28:263-75.
Hurley P, Lyon J, Hall J, Little R, Tsouvalis J, White V and Rose DC, 2022. Co-designing the environmental land management scheme in England: the why, who and how of engaging ‘harder to reach’ stakeholders. People and Nature. 4:744-57.
IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck,A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3056.
Kurian M, Ardakanian R, 2015. Governing the nexus: Water, soil and waste resources considering global change. Springer International Publishing. p. 230.
Magnuszewski P, Giger T, Ksiazczak AM, Brychczynski H, Kułakowska M, 2020. Participatory co-design of sustainability pathways. Guidebook for designing and running online workshops. Available from: (Accessed on February 2023)
Markantonis V, Reynaud A, Karabulut A, El Hajj R, Altinbilek D, Awad IM, Bruggeman A, Constantianos V, Mysiak J, Lamaddalena N, Matoussi MS, Monteiro H, Pistocchi A, Pretato U, Tahboub N, Tunçok IK, Ünver O, Van Ek R, Willaarts B, Bülent S, Zakir T, Bidoglio G, 2019. Can the Implementation of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Support Economic Growth in the Mediterranean Region? The Current Status and the Way Forward. Front. Environ. Sci. 7:84.
Melloni G, Turetta APD, Bonatti M, Sieber S, 2020. A stakeholder analysis for a water-energy-food nexus evaluation in an atlantic forest area: implications for an integrated assessment and a participatory approach. Water. 12:1977.
Menconi ME, Grohmann D, Mancinelli C, 2017. European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: A systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development. Land Use Policy. 60:1-11.
Mohtar R, Daher B, 2016. Water-Energy-Food nexus Framework for facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue. Water Int. 41:655-61.
Neef A, Neubert D, 2011. Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agric. Human Values. 28:179-94.
Newman, R., Ashley, R., Molyneux-Hodgson, S., Cashman, A., 2011. Managing water as a socio-technical system: the shift from ‘experts’ to ‘alliances’. Proc. ICE-Eng. Sustainability 164, 95–102.
Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, Campbell BM, 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat. Sustain. 3:182-90.
O’Donnell EC, Lamond JE, Thorne CR, 2018. Learning and Action Alliance framework to facilitate stakeholder collaboration and social learning in urban flood risk management. Environ. Sci. Policy. 80:1-8.
Pagano A, Pluchinotta I, Pengal P, Cokan B, Giordano R, 2019. Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: a participatory System Dynamics Model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 690:543-55.
Pahl-Wostl C, 2019. Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multi-level coordination challenge. Environ. Sci. Policy. 92:356-67.
Raum S, 2018. A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Ecosyst. Serv. 29:170-84.
Reed M, 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 90:1933-49.
Regione Lazio, 2015. Piano di gestione del rischio alluvioni ai sensi dell’art 7 lettera b) del decreto legislativo 23 febbraio 2010, n. 49 di recepimento della direttiva 2007/60/ce. Savin-Baden M, Howell-Major C, 2013. Qualitative Research. The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge, Abingdon.
Scrieciu A, Pagano A, Coletta VR, Fratino U, Giordano R, 2021. Bayesian Belief Networks for Integrating Scientific and Stakeholders’ Knowledge to Support Nature-Based Solution Implementation. Front. Earth Sci. 9. Available from:
Shinko T, 2022. Prospects and challenges of transdisciplinary research approaches for managing and communicating climate- related risks. UN Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR).
Sterman JD, 2000. Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sušnik J, Staddon C, 2021. Evaluation of Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus Research: Perspectives, Challenges, and Directions for Future Research. JAWRA 58:1189-98.
Sušnik J, Chew C, Domingo X, Mereu S, Trabucco A, Evans B, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia L, Savić DA, Laspidou C, Brouwer F, 2018. Multi-Stakeholder Development of a Serious Game to Explore the Water-Energy-Food-Land-Climate Nexus: The SIM4NEXUS Approach. Water. 10:139.
Tidwell TL, 2016. Nexus between food, energy, water, and forest ecosystems in the USA. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 6:214-24.
Trigila A, Iadanza C, Lastoria B, Bussettini M, Barbano A, 2021. Dissesto idrogeologico in Italia: pericolosità e indicatori di rischio - Edizione 2021. ISPRA, Rapporti 356/2021.
Trinchera A, Parisi B, Baratella V, Roccuzzo G, Soave I, Bazzocchi C, Fichera D, Finotti M, Riva F, Mocciaro G and Brigliadori M, 2020. Assessing the Origin of Phosphonic Acid Residues in Organic Vegetable and Fruit Crops: The Biofosf Project Multi-Actor Approach. Agronomy 10:421.
Vanino S, Pirelli T, Di Bene C, Bøe F, Castanheira N, Chenu C, …, Farina R, 2023. Barriers and opportunities of soil knowledge to address soil challenges: Stakeholders’ perspectives across Europe. J. Environ. Manag. 325:116581.
Vogt WP, 1999. Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences, London: Sage. WEF (World Economic Forum). 2015. “Global Risks 2015: Tenth Edition.” Available from:
Wenger E, 2010. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: The Career of a Concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. London: Springer. pp. 179-98.
Wezel A, Goris M, Bruil J, Félix GF, Peeters A, Bàrberi P, Bellon S, Migliorini P, 2018. Challenges and action points to amplify agroecology in Europe. Sustainability. 10:1598.
Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S, 2009. The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management. Water Resour. Manag. 23:1301-23.
Zomorodian M, Lai SH, Homayounfar M, Ibrahim S, Fatemi SE, El-Shafie A, 2018. The state-of-the-art system dynamics application in integrated water resources modeling. J. Environ. Manag. 227:294-304.

How to Cite

Baratella, V., Pirelli, T., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., Portoghese, I., Bea, M., López-Moya, E., Di Fonzo, A., Fabiani, S., & Vanino, S. (2023). Stakeholders analysis and engagement to address Water-Ecosystem-Food Nexus challenges in Mediterranean environments: a case study in Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 18(4).